星期三, 9月 16, 2026

東吳大學科技法律總論資安組:115學年指定參考資料

 1.          Isabella Banks, Judges-in-the-loop? Judicial involvement in human oversight of high-risk decision support systems under the EU AI Act, 34 International Journal of Law and Information Technology, eaag001 (2026).

https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaag001

2.          Michael Chatzipanagiotis, Incident reporting and investigation under the AI Act: some insights from aviation, 34 International Journal of Law and Information Technology, eaaf019 (2026).

https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaf019

3.           European Data Protection Board, Guidelines 03/2026 on web scraping in the context of generative AI (public consultation).

https://www.edpb.europa.eu/public-consultations/guidelines-032026-on-webscraping-in-the-context-of-generative-ai_en#no-back

4.           Peter J. O'Malley & Peter Underwood, Reimagining corporate governance in the AI era: Law, legitimacy and algorithmic power, 2 Cambridge Forum on AI: Law and Governance, e2 (2026).

https://doi.org/10.1017/cfl.2026.10051

5.          Deirdre Ahern, Directors' duties in the age of agentic artificial intelligence: How can boards navigate corporate purpose and the stakeholder interests of employees around AI adoption?, 2 Cambridge Forum on AI: Law and Governance, e7 (2026).

https://doi.org/10.1017/cfl.2026.10049

6.           Private-Sector AI Governance in Practice: Insights, Challenges & Emerging Cooperation (Insight Report, June 2026).

https://general-recources.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/Privatesector+AI+Governance+in+practice_Insights%2C+challenges+and+emerging+cooperation+approaches_Insight+report.pdf

7.           Toward Interoperability and Inclusive Participation in AI Governance (White Paper v1.1, June 2026).

https://general-recources.s3.us-east1.amazonaws.com/Toward+interoperability+and+inclusive+participation+in+AI+governance_White+paper+v1.1.pdf

8.           UNESCO, Governing AI: nine emerging approaches for lawmakers worldwide.

https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000398520.locale=zh

9.           Abundance and Growth Institute (ARI), Federal Preemption of AI Regulation: What State Legislation Is at Risk? (June 2025).

https://ari.us/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/ARI-Report-Fed-Preemption-6-6-2025.pdf

10.      Frank Pasquale & Vanna Carter, Agentizing Privacy Preferences without Privatizing Data Protection Policy (Cornell Law School Faculty Publications).

https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2916&context=facpub

11.       Rory Van Loo, Consumer Agents (Boston University School of Law Faculty Scholarship No. 4048, 2025).

https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/4048

12.       Graham Greenleaf, The new data protection convention 108+ and its importance for Asia, 34 International Journal of Law and Information Technology, eaaf024 (2026).

https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaf024

13.       Graça Enes, Building a European Data Space, in Revisiting the Liberal Constitutional Features of the European Union (Inês Quadros & Miguel Gorjão-Henriques eds., Springer 2025).

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-95717-8_11

14.       European Law Institute, Model Rules on Succession and Access to Digital Remains.

https://www.europeanlawinstitute.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/p_eli/Publications/ELI_Model_Rules_on_Succession_and_Access_to_Digital_Remains.pdf

15.       S. Anand, S. Donnelly, M. Ehrenhard, L. J. M. Nieuwenhuis & A. Abhishta, Digital sovereignty and the means to European digital security: identification of the goals related to digital sovereignty from legal texts published by the European Union, European Security 1-33 (2026).

https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2026.2627905

 

16.       European Parliamentary Research Service, The European Chips Act: Lessons learnt from three years of implementation, EPRS_BRI(2026)774694 (2026).

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2026/774694/EPRS_BRI(2026)774694_EN.pdf

17.       European Commission, Commission guidance on the application of the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA).

https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/131456

18.       Cabinet Office of Japan (Intellectual Property Strategy Headquarters), Principles-Code for Protection of Intellectual Property Protection and Transparency for the Appropriate Use of Generative AI (with Concrete Examples).

https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisakukaigi/titeki2/ai_kentoukai/kaisai/pdf/ai_principle_code_en.pdf

https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisakukaigi/titeki2/ai_kentoukai/kaisai/pdf/ai_principle_code_gutairei_en.pdf

東吳大學法律研究所資安組科技法律總論期中報告規定-115學年度第1學期

 

 1. 每個題目限由一組同學撰寫,每組至多由二名同學組成。請參考「東吳大學科技法律總論資安組:115學年指定參考資料」並擇定一份。每個題目限由一組同學撰寫,若有重複者,請班代進行協調,後續會進行報告次序之重新排序。選題請在924日前定案,並傳給老師

 

2.101日起,分三至四梯次,依老師排定日期,各組推派一名報告人代表於上課時提出報告,以「指定參考資料」內容為主,期中報告至少34千字。101日徵求兩組自願報告。

 

3.期中報告請說明:(1)指定參考資料內容完整介紹(2)期末報告預定之題目與研究範圍(3)想要解決的問題以及預期結果、(4)已經蒐集資料。

 

4. 每組口頭報告時間為1520分鐘,請同組一名同學負責計時,

時間到請報告人停止報告。

 

5. 報告封面請述明:題目、組別、組員名稱、學號。

 

6. 報告當日請提交一份紙本報告與簡報給老師,並請上傳班上之雲端硬碟。 

 

7.由老師就報告進行講評,作為期末報告之參考。

 

8.論文格式請參照國科會人文處法律學門法學期刊引註格式凡例

資料來源:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_YtBApMht5BjfKlwIiqKqP-2BulJ2DaN/view?fbclid=IwY2xjawN38X5leHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFKWnJuWU41amFPYXpCWTY4c3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHmzpUD-JEJae7OLkdXiBPgTv-GcOs4NwgpFpNv4Pt3pPBfFh7LcophuxZ-b__aem_M9gDjz4ePd9iAjPEviPWOg

東吳大學科技法律總論科法組:115學年指定參考資料

 1.         Claudio Novelli, Philipp Hacker, Sarah McDougall, Jessica Morley, Antonino Rotolo & Luciano Floridi, Getting Regulatory Sandboxes Right: Design and Governance Under the AI Act, European Journal of Risk Regulation 1-27 (published online 2026).

https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2026.10096

2.         Hans Graux et al., Interplay between the AI Act and the EU Digital Legislative Framework, European Parliament, PE 778.575 (Oct. 2025).

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2025/778575/ECTI_STU(2025)778575_EN.pdf

3.        Thibault Schrepel, Decoding the AI Act: Implications for Competition Law and Market Dynamics, 21(3) Journal of Competition Law & Economics 374-389 (Sept. 2025).

https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhaf007

4.         Wenlong Li, Yueming Zhang, Qingqing Zheng & Aolan Li, How the Legal Basis for AI Training is Framed in Data Protection Guidelines and Interventions: Comparative Perspectives and the Prospect of Global Convergence, 16(2) International Data Privacy Law, ipaf032 (June 2026).

https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipaf032

5.        Michał Jackowski & Jarosław Greser, AI and corporate responsibility – From fragmented compliance to unified governance, 2 Cambridge Forum on AI: Law and Governance, e3 (2026).

https://doi.org/10.1017/cfl.2026.10046

6.        Australian Institute of Company Directors, A Director's Guide to AI Governance, Version 2 (29 June 2026).

https://www.aicd.com.au/news-media/research-and-reports/a-directors-guide-toai-governance.html

7.        Baek Jungmi, Regulatory governance of AI in the generative AI era: A comparative study of South Korea's AI Basic Act and the EU AI Act for sustainable digital transformation, 15(3) Laws 42 (2026).

https://doi.org/10.3390/laws15030042

8.         Giuseppe Colangelo, The DMA Meets the New Intermediaries: AI Agents and the Future of Gatekeeper Regulation (International Center for Law & Economics, May 2026).

https://laweconcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Colangelo-The-DMA-Meetsthe-New-Intermediaries.pdf

9.        European Law Institute, Guiding Principles and Model Rules on Digital Assistants for Consumer Contracts.

https://www.europeanlawinstitute.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/p_eli/Projects/Algorithmic_Contracts/Guiding_Principles_and_Model_Rules_on_Digital_Assistants_for_Consumer_Contracts.pdf

10.      Seiichi Igaya, Operator-first versus operation-first: regulatory architectures in data protection law and the Meta Platforms judgment, 16(2) International Data Privacy Law, ipag006 (June 2026).

https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipag006

11.      Regina Becker & Edward S. Dove, The EU GDPR and secondary use of health and genetic data for research support purposes, 16(2) International Data Privacy Law, ipag001 (June 2026).

https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipag001

12.      Mikołaj Barczentewicz, Build AI, Don't Block Access: The European Union's Digital-Sovereignty Trap (International Center for Law & Economics, May 2026).

https://laweconcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/european-ai-sovereigntymeets-the-silicon-shortage-MB.pdf

13.      European Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology & Technopolis Group (O. Strauka, T. Timan & A. Denais), Study on the EU's critical digital capacities deployment beyond 2027 – Annex 4: Technology area report, artificial intelligence (Publications Office of the European Union 2026).

https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/1036940

14.      Kristian Stout, Ben Sperry & Subiksha Ramakrishnan, Generative AI: When Fair Use Becomes Unfair Competition, 32 George Mason Law Review 779.

https://lawreview.gmu.edu/print__issues/generative-ai-when-fair-use-becomes-unfaircompetition/

15.     Edward M. Iacobucci, Consumer Privacy and Anticompetitive Exclusion, 22(1) Journal of Competition Law & Economics 138-158 (Mar. 2026).

https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhaf023

 

 

16.     The economics of copyright and AI: empirical evidence and optimal policy

https://euagenda.eu/publications/the-economics-of-copyright-and-ai-empirical-evidence-and-optimal-policy